It's a shame the article spends too much time on political correctness (I couldn't determine who was doing what, half the time, thanks to the foolish use of the wrong pronouns) instead of marshaling evidence clearly and decisively. It's not difficult to credit federal agents with stupid behavior - we saw it on our screens clearly on many occasions - but as so many US right-wingers are in denial its important to present a clear argument instead of PC waffle. And the idea that covid is a meaningful risk factor relative to being tear-gassed, when all studies and data show that at least 80% and up to 93% of those who contract it remain totally symptom-free, is another PC distraction. Best to concentrate on the important argument and discard the pointless PC that adds nothing except noise.