It's difficult to know whether or not this article is a parody. First of all, it discusses a supposed problem that doesn't in fact exist. Secondly, as is often the case, it fails entirely to understand what atheism actually is (merely the rational stance that one should draw conclusions from empirical evidence rather than run away with flights of fancy for which there has never been even a shred of evidence). In short, this article is an incoherent polemic in which a poorly-constructed argument against a non-existent position rambles on without ever once being interesting or informative.