This is quite a thought-provoking article. It's clear that most published science is bogus and that peer review doesn't work. It's also clear that political correctness has crushed the life out of potentially important fields like evolutionary psychology (all the important questions are off-limits because the findings could contradict PC dogma). So alternatives are to be welcomed but we have to acknowledge that they too will be systemically flawed, though for somewhat different reasons. In the end, the real solution will be for everyone to be required to publish raw data sets so that third party verification is always possible. Today, even respected researchers "adjust" their data or simply withhold it altogether - a sure sign something is very rotten in the state of academia.